@junseth :
@PaulSnow, you enjoy telling lies. It's fine. But it's pretty clear. You misrepresent the nature of your project, and people like @cryptonaut and @adam provide you cover by making it difficult for discussion to take place. Again, fine, but I will enjoy very much when people finally see that your project has no clothes.
Six little questions you can't respond to say you are nothing but a troll.
If I lie, surely.... surely you could quote one and say: Here is a lie!
I on the other hand can absolutely do so. You claim the list Chris posted was "100% right". In said list, Chris made all sorts of factual errors and interpretations not supported by facts. One very easy error concerned Epigraph and Factom. Chris states we claimed credit for the Honduras project that should have gone to Epigraph. And only some time later admitted that Epigraph did the land title software. This was a whole bullet point! What exactly did he say? Oh yeah, just after the bullet point about Bnktothefuture:
Care to read the third sentence in the first story about Factom and Honduras?
"The company is doing the project with Epigraph, a title software company that uses blockchain technology, also based in Austin."
Now I would just say you were wrong (not lying) except that even after both you and Chris have been repeatedly notified errors in the list, you state "First off, Chris is right 100%" And Chris says, "I stand by all our claims."
Knowing the truth, but standing by false statements does in fact make you two liars, engaged in intentional libel.
If I had lied, you could do the same. You could quote me, and you could provide evidence that the statement I made was a lie. It just isn't that hard.
