The LTB Network Forum

Let's Talk about Factom's Repeated Lies and "mistakes" - per cryptonaught's request

Back to General

Comments

• junseth

  

  Offline
  Posts: 57
  Location: Florida

  @cryptonaut has deleted 4 posts that I have put up in reference to this topic. Censorship at it's finest.

  Posted on November 17, 2015 at 12:21 PM
  Permalink
  0 likes
• Cryptonaut

  

  Offline
  Posts: 1944
  Location: Canada

  Yes @junseth I've deleted multiple of your posts because this thread is about Factom and your trying to make it about you vs. Adam again. You guys already failed pretty hard on that yesterday and its kind of just ridiculous now, get over it and whine on your show this sunday or w/e. Adams gone for the week actually, I did this on my own initiative, not that you care since you believe whatever you want. Last warning.

  If you have a problem with it, you can respond via PM (which I already PMd you to stop with this shit, but you ignored it of course)

  Posted on November 17, 2015 at 12:21 PM
  Last Edited: November 17, 2015 at 12:25 PM
  Permalink
  0 likes
• junseth

  

  Offline
  Posts: 57
  Location: Florida

  Lol, you mean the debate wherein Adam denied supporting censorship of the kind you are currently committing? My comments were on topic, and you are arbitrarily deciding they are not. You can do whatever you want. I don't really care. You guys want to put into the Telos of Christ that you support Factom, that's fine. You want to make claims that you do not censor while deleting posts you do not like, that's also fine. Lol, you want to tell me that you did not "kick us off" LTB while trying to threaten that you are going to do just that because you don't like the content of my speech, that's fine as well. :)

  Posted on November 17, 2015 at 12:26 PM
  Permalink
  0 likes
• Cryptonaut

  

  Offline
  Posts: 1944
  Location: Canada

  The posts I deleted were a bunch of sarcastic shit giving Adam "6 hours and 32 seconds" to answer some questions regarding the bitcoin uncensored show, nothing to do really with Factom, just trying to incite more arguments from Adam specifically, and probably because I locked the other thread (which had turned into a shit show). We have already told you guys we are not invested in Factom and don't even know a whole lot about it. @PaulSnow seems to be doing a good job of defending the project himself, and am sure will keep going if you have any questions. I really do not care about you complaining about posts getting deleted, it's all in the database still, if anyone thinks that it wasn't justified, feel free to PM me and I can show the buried content.

  Now, back to the thread...

  edit actually, if anyone is curious and wants to see what posts were deleted from the horribly oppressed junseth, you can see them here: http://pastebin.com/dUwzwA5H

  Posted on November 17, 2015 at 12:37 PM
  Last Edited: November 17, 2015 at 5:01 PM
  Permalink
  0 likes
• junseth

  

  Offline
  Posts: 57
  Location: Florida

  @crypotonaut has censored 6 posts that are relevant to this thread.

  Posted on November 17, 2015 at 12:39 PM
  Permalink
  0 likes
• junseth

  

  Offline
  Posts: 57
  Location: Florida

  The irony is strong here.

  Posted on November 17, 2015 at 12:43 PM
  Permalink
  0 likes
• Phoenix

  

  Offline
  Posts: 32

  @foodtaster Glad to hear that at least two members of your Factom team, Chris and Joshua are bringing attention to this issue.

  Do you really write here, that you believe, Chris and Joshua are members of the Factom-team?

  Because... if I'm reading this right, and...

  • if you really believe that is right, this would be a very interesting proof, that you are totally obvious unable to understand even simple things.

  OR

  • if you just pretend to believe that, it's in some ways a typical but very(!) stupid move to hide the fact, that you're a socketpuppet-account, with some confusion.

  Would you please please please answer... ?

  Posted on November 17, 2015 at 12:46 PM
  Last Edited: November 17, 2015 at 1:13 PM
  Permalink
  0 likes
• PaulSnow

  

  Offline
  Posts: 30

  @junseth: @crypotonaut has censored 6 posts that are relevant to this thread.

  Not very quickly. I read them, and couldn't find anything about Factom in those posts to respond to.

  The irony is strong here.

  Indeed. There are six fairly simple questions you COULD respond to. Instead you act like a child, and whine about what any sane person would consider rather modest moderation.

  What exactly is your problem @junseth? If you can make your case, do so. Or maybe as @mdw suggested, you should admit you can't, assert that none the less you will be proven right, and go your way. You have made your opposition to Factom clear, and I seriously can respect that. Why?

  We have our own token. Many people see systems like Factom and Counterparty as competing with Bitcoin, since they have their own tokens.

  We have raised money for our project. I am not sure why this is, but many people are very suspicious of any fundraising.

  We have talked about use cases for Factom. Some of these use cases are going to become reality. I would not work on a project if I didn't believe that. Some will not. That's true of any tech, it is hard to guess exactly how it will be applied. But many people cannot distinguish between a startup talking about potential markets from more established companies talking about existing markets.

  I could go on. Please feel free to discuss Factom here, use facts, and restrain from attacks that contain no content. And I am sure you will not be censored.

  Posted on November 17, 2015 at 1:51 PM
  Permalink
  1 like
• foodtaster

  

  Offline
  Posts: 8

  @phoenix

  @foodtaster Glad to hear that at least two members of your Factom team, Chris and Joshua are bringing attention to this issue.

  Do you really write here, that you believe, Chris and Joshua are members of the Factom-team?

  Because... if I'm reading this right, and...

  • if you really believe that is right, this would be a very interesting proof, that you are totally obvious unable to understand even simple things.

  OR

  • if you just pretend to believe that, it's in some ways a typical but very(!) stupid move to hide the fact, that you're a socketpuppet-account, with some confusion.

  Would you please please please answer... ?

  Good, you have mastered the art of false dichotomy. Now, can you solve my koan?

  Posted on November 17, 2015 at 2:19 PM
  Permalink
  0 likes
• junseth

  

  Offline
  Posts: 57
  Location: Florida

  @PaulSnow, you enjoy telling lies. It's fine. But it's pretty clear. You misrepresent the nature of your project, and people like @cryptonaut and @adam provide you cover by making it difficult for discussion to take place. Again, fine, but I will enjoy very much when people finally see that your project has no clothes.

  Posted on November 17, 2015 at 2:22 PM
  Permalink
  0 likes

Post Reply