@loon3
@loon3 @markxmayer @popinjay @therealtwig @kyleatlas @necrix @jeffski1 @troy112 @Ronniejames @CryptoConrad @Doogy
and with the addition of
@scipio @silvergoldandbitcoin @roadwarriors
This puts us at 14, which shouldn't be a problem.
I'm thinking a league fee of 10,000 LTBc per team which is right around $20. It's enough skin in the game for each manager to have incentive to remain active throughout the season. I also prefer a winner take all style as opposed to smaller payouts for 2nd and 3rd place but I'm open for discussion.
Let me know if the league fee is reasonable and I'll move forward with posting instructions on how this is all going to work.
I like the buy in but have a proposal for an addition to the buy in. I have been part of another fantasy league for the past several years where we really had to fight inactivity late, especially when owners had a poor record. Therefore, we instituted part of the buy in dedicated to a winner take all side pot for the highest scoring week of the season. Everyone has had incentive to win something, therefore everyone has put their best effort in each week since then, regardless of record.
How about a 10,000 + 5,000 LTBc buy in across 14 teams with the following payout distribution:
- 130,000 LTBc to the winner.
- 10,000 LTBc to the runner up (get your buy in back).
- 70,000 LTBc to the owner that has the highest scoring week during the fantasy regular season.
There, of course, will need to be more discussion over type of league....auction or standard. My vote honestly would be standard snake draft (ABCDDCBA...etc), standard scoring in a head-to-head league with the following positions:
- QB
- RB
- RB
- WR
- WR
- FLEX
- K
- DST
- BENCH X6
What do you guys think?
