While most altcoins are getting slaughtered, LTC shines propelled higher by Litepay and a new fork. Bitcoin continues its gains as well but stopped short of a new rally. Bitcoin Higher but Stops Short of New Rally Bitcoin prices traded even higher si...
Community Directory
- 16,606 Profile views
- 1 Article Published
- 203 Forum Posts
- Real Name: Mike Roncone
- LTBcoin Compatible Address: 1DdfhFau6iycFA7WnQPKqX8V7j7eBUXYpZ
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Bitcoin Tipping Address (This is not your LTBCOIN address): 1DdfhFau6iycFA7WnQPKqX8V7j7eBUXYpZ
User Activity
Forum Posts
- Replies: 194
- Topics: 9
- Likes Received: 102
-
Re: Hackers Steal $1.65 Million in NXT from BTER Exchange
Terrible news for BTER, but I'm of the opinion that a rollback is quite unsettling.
How would you go back and redistribute the transactions that came afterwards? Sure they could be recreated, but then how do you go about and prevent the double spend in the instant that the chain is backed up and then reinitialized?
The security of the blockchain is that added transactions are added transactions forever. They are the first and last authority on the issue, and the idea of potentially rolling it back t I feel undermines a key part of the philosophy of the ledger system in the first place.
Posted on August 17, 2014 at 6:55 PM
Crypto-News -
Re: 100K LTBCoin for BTC
Sorry, mate. You're looking for roughly 2.5-4x the current market rate if you look at both Melotic and Counterparty. Too much heat for my blood on that trade.
Posted on August 17, 2014 at 6:07 PM
Offering LTBCOIN For... -
Re: LTB editing should be de-centralised
It was my understanding that the editing process would eventually be fully decentralized (or at least -- as much as possible) from my conversations with Adam and the other editors. This would actually start with authors hiring editors themselves, which I think many would not be willing to fork up the LTBc right now. As you can imagine, this is relatively difficult when we all need to make sure that the content is something that people will actually want to read (no dirt, hatred, real nasty stuff etc), and is structurally sound enough to present to people (grammar, flow, word choice, etc).
Keep in mind that although we are contributing content to the LTB network, the LTB network is ultimately more at risk for publishing our content than we are. Most people that come and read an article on LTB will think it is LTB's article, and not necessarily pay any attention to the person that wrote the article. If you want any proof of this, just think of all the buzz going around about how Coindesk and others are stealing articles from people. It is never the specific author that is accused, but rather the outlet.
In regards to the current state of affairs, there's been a decline of editors (to which I have been utterly useless to everyone the past two weeks) and an influx of articles. We're working on this until the new system is functional. Which, by the way, Adam's writeup above is the most detailed iteration I've seen of this and it sounds great. In the meantime, I'll get back to work and try to help @rotalumis and @cherapple clean this mess up :P
Posted on August 17, 2014 at 4:05 PM
Content Garden -
Re: 100K LTBC Giveaway
Chain Radio, on top of their game as always!
I'll be tuning in after work for sure.
Posted on August 17, 2014 at 3:48 PM
Offering LTBCOIN For... -
Re: How do you deal with plagiarism?
@mike As has been stated above, they did manage to source you which I actually view as a good thing. I would love for my site's content to be syndicated by others so long as they point back to the original source and drive traffic to me!
You realize they changed it after the fact. After he called them out for it and they saw this link in the logs. They wouldn't have done anything otherwise.
I didn't realize that, no. This was a fresh thread and nobody had mentioned that, so I didn't imagine that they had enough time to see the post and change it. My apologies.
Posted on August 11, 2014 at 2:53 PM
General -
Re: LTBn value per user
This is actually extremely cool. Especially when you consider that LTBc was only launched a very short while ago. Plus the average value per user is quickly approaching that of LinkedIn according the the article linked about.
Posted on August 11, 2014 at 2:30 PM
Project Development -
Re: How do you deal with plagiarism?
As has been stated above, they did manage to source you which I actually view as a good thing. I would love for my site's content to be syndicated by others so long as they point back to the original source and drive traffic to me!
Posted on August 11, 2014 at 2:24 PM
General -
Re: AUCTION VENDING MACHINES ARE NOW OPERATIONAL
Cheers, mate!
Posted on August 11, 2014 at 2:19 PM
Currently Live Auctions -
Re: [CLOSED][Auction] Air time on Let's Talk Bitcoin! Two 45 Second Sponsorship Slots for Episode #134 due to air 8/09. Auction Closes at 6:00 PM PST on 8/08! Current High Bid(s): 81,250 / 62,000 LTBc
@tron Next time I need to read the rules.
Hahahah, sorry mate. I really hated to do it, but I don't want to set a bad precedent.
Posted on August 8, 2014 at 6:30 PM
Completed Auctions -
Re: [CLOSED][Auction] Air time on Let's Talk Bitcoin! Two 45 Second Sponsorship Slots for Episode #134 due to air 8/09. Auction Closes at 6:00 PM PST on 8/08! Current High Bid(s): 81,250 / 62,000 LTBc
Official Standings:
- Slot one: 81,250 LTBc @bcohen for http://storj.io/
- Slot two: 62,000 LTBc from @kerneloops for @cmason's talk about Gaza
- First Runner-up: 61,000 LTBc from @tron for https://CoinCPA.com
- Second Runner-up: 40,010 LTBc from @2mdoty for crypti.me
Other bidders: @coinfire, @dgiors, @rob, @btcblue
Congratulations to our winners, and thank you all for giving it a shot. The past couple auctions have been quite slow so it's nice to get some bids in.
@bcohen and @kerneloops please remit payment to: 16mtsJE29zY5Rw2c4XunVFeg7DmbGedS9M at your earliest convenience.
Sorry everyone else! Please try again next time and thanks for your support.
Posted on August 8, 2014 at 6:12 PM
Completed Auctions











3,378 views