The LTB Network Forum


Thinking of Spamming the Forums? Consider Yourself Warned!

Back to General

Jump to bottom
Pages: 1234

Comments

rotalumis

Spam is starting to get out of control and people are posting very low quality stuff to quickly "get their 10 posts in". (See discussion here.)

Here's what we're going to do:

Posts that get flagged and deleted will get you NEGATIVE Proof of Participation and a loss of LTBc. That's very easy to implement, and we can make it as harsh as necessary. It could even carry over to following weeks and lower your future rewards. There is no excuse for spam.

We might make a post about this when it's up, or we might not. Anyone who is posting spam or useless posts like "me too" or "wow thats cool", consider yourself warned.

The same thing goes for those posting silly threads, or threads that are off-topic.

This measure will reduce spam and leave more LTBc for those who post genuinely good comments.

17 likes
  • Cryptonaut

    +1

    keep things on topic people :)

    Permalink
    0 likes
  • inigthz

    Yap, of course.. when i looks spams.

    Hahaha.. :D

    Permalink
    0 likes
  • Cryptonaut

    @inigthz Yap, of course.. when i looks spams.

    Hahaha.. :D

    haha what is going on in that picture?

    Permalink
    0 likes
  • inigthz

    @cryptonaut

    @inigthz Yap, of course.. when i looks spams.

    Hahaha.. :D

    haha what is going on in that picture?

    That's not forums guys. That's social media. :D

    Permalink
    0 likes
  • page

    That sounds like a great idea to me. Giving both an incentive to post good quality posts, while at the same time incurring a cost for mediocre posts!

    Permalink
    0 likes
  • Cryptonaut

    @page That sounds like a great idea to me. Giving both an incentive to post good quality posts, while at the same time incurring a cost for mediocre posts!

    exactly. With how it is right now, its more of an incentive just to post anything rather than contributing to discussions.

    Permalink
    0 likes
  • chewi

    Sounds pragmatic and reasonable. I've translated first post to russian and posted here.

    Permalink
    3 likes
  • cefp

    @rotalumis ....

    That's very easy to implement, and we can make it as harsh as necessary.

    This subjectivity.

    Who decides?

    By what criteria?

    Permalink
    2 likes
  • pomalex

    @chewi Sounds pragmatic and reasonable. I've translated first post to russian and posted here.

    Made repost in heare

    https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=714069.msg8573536#msg8573536

    Permalink
    3 likes
  • rotalumis

    @cefp

    @rotalumis ....

    That's very easy to implement, and we can make it as harsh as necessary.

    This subjectivity.

    Who decides?

    By what criteria?

    The results we want to achieve will set the criteria. If the penalty is not harsh enough to deter spam, it will have to be increased. Repeat spammers could get bigger penalties on successive occasions. There are lots of ways we could tweak the system.

    Permalink
    2 likes
Jump to top
Pages: 1234

Post Reply

Please Login to post a reply to this thread.

© Copyright 2013–2016 The LTB Network. All rights reserved .