The LTB Network Forum

Verify Address

Back to LTB Platform Development & Support

Comments

TheWittyHawk

Offline
Posts: 40

The new verify address in account settings gives me invalid. I copied straight from the page source and used both with and without the spaces.

Posted on July 26, 2014 at 11:03 AM

1 like

• irnhnve

  

  Offline
  Posts: 228

  @thewittyhawk The new verify address in account settings gives me invalid. I copied straight from the page source and used both with and without the spaces.

  What is the benefit of verifying an address? Is it just a protective measure against future incidents?

  Posted on July 26, 2014 at 11:16 AM
  Permalink
  0 likes
• TheWittyHawk

  

  Offline
  Posts: 40

  Honestly, I have no idea. I just wanted to try it out. Why not right? :)

  Posted on July 26, 2014 at 11:29 AM
  Permalink
  0 likes
• CrimsonRoze

  

  Offline
  Posts: 295
  Location: Göteborg, Sweden

  Same issue here. I've tried to copy the message straight from the source, I've tried upper and lowercase variants both with and without spaces.

  I assume this functionality simply isnt' functional yet.

  Can you confirm @cryptonaut?

  Posted on July 26, 2014 at 12:23 PM
  Permalink
  0 likes
• Nilli

  

  Offline
  Posts: 9
  Location: Europe

  I also get "Invalid" when I try to sign a message in the LTB Address Manager. I'm using Counterwallet.co's message signing feature, in case that's at all relevant.

  Posted on July 26, 2014 at 12:30 PM
  Permalink
  0 likes
• Cryptonaut

  

  Offline
  Posts: 1944
  Location: Canada

  Hey guys sorry I should have put a note on there, currently there is an issue with how counterwallet signs messages which is making them invalid (should be fixed pretty soon). Signing messages from other wallets (e.g bitcoin-qt or electrum) appears to work fine.

  Posted on July 26, 2014 at 12:37 PM
  Permalink
  0 likes
• adam

  

  Offline
  Posts: 1980
  Location: California, USA

  @cryptonaut Hey guys sorry I should have put a note on there, currently there is an issue with how counterwallet signs messages which is making them invalid (should be fixed pretty soon). Signing messages from other wallets (e.g bitcoin-qt or electrum) appears to work fine.

  I was able to simply verify by sending .0001btc to the verify address, very fast and gets around the signing issue.

  Posted on July 26, 2014 at 2:38 PM
  Permalink
  0 likes
• derfshaya

  

  Offline
  Posts: 4
  Location: Singapore

  Just a shot in a dark, but is this verification feature for a possible future implementation of Token-Controlled Viewpoint?

  Posted on July 26, 2014 at 11:13 PM
  Permalink
  0 likes
• CrimsonRoze

  

  Offline
  Posts: 295
  Location: Göteborg, Sweden

  @derfshaya Just a shot in a dark, but is this verification feature for a possible future implementation of Token-Controlled Viewpoint?

  Most likely, as without it TCV would be easy to game.

  Posted on July 26, 2014 at 11:17 PM
  Permalink
  0 likes
• Cryptonaut

  

  Offline
  Posts: 1944
  Location: Canada

  @derfshaya Just a shot in a dark, but is this verification feature for a possible future implementation of Token-Controlled Viewpoint?

  nice guess. That's exactly what we will be using it for.

  Posted on July 26, 2014 at 11:28 PM
  Permalink
  0 likes
• KriszDev

  

  Offline
  Posts: 2

  I have the same issue. Are you guys using counterwallet?

  Posted on July 27, 2014 at 1:57 AM
  Permalink
  0 likes

Post Reply