Good community attracts good community, we're going to turn every community member into a moderator letting them use their LTBc to curate comments and make an ltbc profit from the platform if they do a good job
Roze: ah, I see. decentralized moderation! I think I read or heard about that, you'll weigh the value based on how close to consensus each individals actions are and incentivize a functioning wisdom of the crowd scenarion. Lets see if that solves the "internet troll problem" that gavin spoke about in amsterdam :)
LTBCOIN: Its not fully automated
Basically users put their LTBc at risk betting that it does not meet published standards, ones that are non-controversial are dealt with and compensated automatically, controversial ones have a moderator make apply the rules and take a flat fee (probably 20%) for their service no matter the decision. The losing side donates their LTBc to the winning side, split proportionally. So its not about consensus its about if it will be found to comply with the published standards or not. This will be
Roze: Hmm.. then maybe I read about something else then. That sounds like a good system as well, though only for content publication.
Roze: the same concept should probably work for hiding spam and up/down voting comments on the content as well though. time will tell, I guess.
LTBCOIN: It'll be the system for a bunch of qualitative things, and it works for comment moderation. You don't want "disagree" to be the same as "flag" - This is for "flag"
LTBCOIN: agree/disagree is directly tipping the commenter or someone not the commenter
