The LTB Network Forum


AUCTION VENDING MACHINES ARE NOW OPERATIONAL

Back to Currently Live Auctions

Jump to bottom

Comments

  • Rob

    @deweller
    @jamesmm asked an extremely important question, that I'll reword based on my own lack of understanding how this works (after placing several bids and starting my own auction):

    Let's say I bid 10,000, and I am later outbid, and my next bid needs to be 12,000 to regain the lead, do I send 2,000 more to bid 12,000, or do I have to send 12,000 (which I may not have, since I just sent 10K to lock in my initial bid)? I didn't think about how important Jamesmm's question was, until I started getting hands-on with this. I'm hoping the answer is I'd need to send 2K more to up my bid to 12K, as it makes the most sense to me. Problem is, I don't think it's intuitive, and needs to be explained in detail to bidders. And I'd volunteer to write up instructions for bidders and sellers, if I feel I'm totally understand what's going on.

    I also can't help but wonder if the extremely high bids on the most recent LTB show ad auction were due to the bidders bidding 10,000, then 12,000 as a higher bid, not understanding they needed to bid just 2K on the second bid. @bcohen, is this what you meant, or is this a different theory than yours (on why the bids got so high)?

    Permalink
    2 likes
  • faceface

    @rob

    @faceface

    @adam this is a fundamentally better way once we work out the bugs.

    Why?

    It was better for me to buy HOURCONSULT tokens, with the idea I can speculate and sell the token to someone else in the future (assuming all goes well with the system and Adam).

    That was my plan too (originally), to invest my LTBc in an inflation free commodity, however, the impression I got from @adam was that acting as his pimp wasn't that cool.

    Also, what an amazing experimental way to practice using tokens as mediums of exchange for different things. While it may not have been helpful for your personal experience of simply wanting an hour of Adam's time right away, I'd think you might see how it relates to everything that is going on here.

    Yeah, defo interesting, and perhaps a 'cleaner' way to do it rather than by email, however, me emailing my skype details, setting a time, etc. ... none of that was in any way helped by the existence of HOURCONSULT. Of course I take your point. My point is that it should be optional on the auction app.

    Permalink
    2 likes
  • bcohen

    REFER TO: http://letstalkbitcoin.com/forum/post/auction-vending-machines-are-now-operational?page=5#post-17581 Before Reading

    @rob,

    This is my (non-dev) understanding.

    Proxy Bidding is not being used. I believe it should. Proxy bidding would automatically/automagically adjust a bidder's bid while the bidder in theory would need only place one bid and the highest bid that they are willing to bid on an auction. So as new bidders enter play and so long as your bid is higher than any of the bidders, the bid would be adjusted automatically until the high bid is breached and a new bidder has their high bid registered (rinse and repeat). This is how eBay works.

    • Let's Say the minimum bid is 10,000

    • Bidder Brian Bids 100,000 (this number is secret)

    • Current Bid is now at 10,000 with Brian @ Top Bid of 10,000

    • Bidder Rob Bids 25,000

    • Current Bid is now at 25,250 with Brian @ Top Bid of 25,250

    Notice that although Brian bid 100,000 that Brian could possibly win the auction with a bid of 25,250!

    THE CURRENT SYSTEM

    The current system registers the bidder's high bid without "stepping" up.

    • Let's Say the minimum bid is 10,000

    • If Bidder Brian Bids 50,000

    • Current Bid is now 50,000

    • Bidder Rob Bids 75,000

    • Current Bid is now 75,000

    • Bidder Brian Bids 100,000

    • Current Bid is now 100,000

    The current system encourages multiple bidding rather than placing a single bid. And I believe to answer your (and @jamesmm ) question (and I could be wrong in this regards) that in the second scenario ....that my 100,000 bid is essentially competing with my first bid and therefore am Bidding 100,000 on top of the 50,000 of my first bid. If i'm the winning bidder at 100,000 then the 50,000 would be released from escrow (i'm not sure if i'm using this term properly here). Basically I sent 150,000 and 50,000 would be returned to me at the end of the auction. I would have 150,000 wrapped up in counterparty to enable the 100,000 winning bid

    HOWEVER, in theory I could get outbid in a proxy auction ... decide to place a new high bid and the scenario would be somewhat similar to the second scenario---

    I think Proxy bidding is the most fair and convenient way to conduct these auctions. Convenient because under the present setup a smart bidder will strategically place a number of bids and likely stick around to snipe at the end of the auction---lots of time and effort.

    With proxy bidding.. the bidder has the option to just bid as high as they are willing to bid and let the Robots take care of business.

    @rob @deweller
    @jamesmm asked an extremely important question, that I'll reword based on my own lack of understanding how this works (after placing several bids and starting my own auction):

    Let's say I bid 10,000, and I am later outbid, and my next bid needs to be 12,000 to regain the lead, do I send 2,000 more to bid 12,000, or do I have to send 12,000 (which I may not have, since I just sent 10K to lock in my initial bid)? I didn't think about how important Jamesmm's question was, until I started getting hands-on with this. I'm hoping the answer is I'd need to send 2K more to up my bid to 12K, as it makes the most sense to me. Problem is, I don't think it's intuitive, and needs to be explained in detail to bidders. And I'd volunteer to write up instructions for bidders and sellers, if I feel I'm totally understand what's going on.

    I also can't help but wonder if the extremely high bids on the most recent LTB show ad auction were due to the bidders bidding 10,000, then 12,000 as a higher bid, not understanding they needed to bid just 2K on the second bid. @bcohen, is this what you meant, or is this a different theory than yours (on why the bids got so high)?

    REFER TO: http://letstalkbitcoin.com/forum/post/auction-vending-machines-are-now-operational?page=5#post-17581 Before Reading

    Permalink
    0 likes
  • faceface

    @adam

    @faceface

    @adam this is a fundamentally better way once we work out the bugs.

    Why?

    Tokens that can be redeemed for something valuable are better than the something valuable by itself because chances are pretty good the something valuable is difficult to buy/sell/trade. By making a token specific to that purpose, you imbue the value of the thing with the transmissability, verifiability, etc. of the bitcoin network onto whatever it is you're representing.

    Not if I don't honour the backing. Of course this is 'the big problem', how to tie blockchain technology into the real world, but, well... it's a problem here too.

    It gives you more options, which makes it more useful which makes it more valuable. You would acquire and hold the SPONSOR tokens because you think they will appreciate greater than alternatives so you might be betting my time appreciates in value more (whether because I become more high profile and thus the time more valuable or because the LTBc you sell it for will be worth more than the LTBc you bought on the market.

    OK, for SPONSOR tokens this totally makes sense.

    Someone who believes my time is undervalued can buy up my HOURCONSULT tokens then market my expertise and the value of my time to other people and sell the token to them at a profit, they redeem it with me, I don't have to care how it happened and I don't have to worry about if its a valid token or not. It exists, they have it, the only way that can happen is if someone gets them from me first so no problem.

    I'd like to do this in future. When I mentioned the idea before it was kinda squashed because you didn't want your time floating in the wild for too long (which I totally understand).

    Tokens give you options you dont otherwise have.

    OK, I guess I just resent having to arbitrarily send back a token I had (literally) only just been sent in addition to the rigmarole of setting up the meeting in exactly the same way I would have to do without the token.

    I think that having a token to redeem against an auction should be optional when creating the auction because it's just a faff and only stands for the thing in word only (and we're only using words to transact currently). i.e. Hey, I won, here is my address, please ship me a keychain, etc.

    Permalink
    0 likes
  • Rob

    @bcohen - I totally understand that you want ebay-style bidding, and that's certainly easier than having manually bid and rebid and rebid.

    But I also think, if that isn't what is being done now (perhaps for technical reasons, perhaps for other reasons), having to pay the full amount of each bid (rather than adding the amount to increase the bid) is pretty much impossible for many. A couple of bid raises (each requiring a full bid amount) and you're out of LTBc. Meanwhile, the guy who just bids once at the end isn't depleted of LTBc, since he didn't bid several times during the auction. That's why I hope at least the bids are placed incrementally. Users desperately need to be informed how it works currently!

    @faceface - I hear what you're saying. I agree that Adam reversed directions on how he was handling the hour consultations a couple of times, and that was very confusing for me too. And I understand what a waste of time the token was in your case, and why it just added to the hassle of the process.

    However, this is all a big experiment, and the auction for his time was part of this experiment, which you participated in. All in all, I'd say you lucked out, since you received an hour of Adam's time at a price way way way below what it should have been (as has everyone who has won these auctions -- including me!). We got this bargain for an hour of Adam's time only because of this experiment. Sure, we have to go through a few extra steps with the token, and that wasn't as efficient as it could have been. But that seems like a relatively small price to pay. Hopefully you can see it from this perspective.

    And note that I thought a token representing a keychain was kind of silly, but I still wanted to try auctioning a keychain token. But then I thought a bit more about it. What if they buyer wanted to tip someone with a Bitcoin keychain? Now they could just send the token to anyone's address on the forum, to send a neat gift. The recipient could claim it and get a physical keychain, or they could send it to someone else. Sure, it will be a bit more hassle to claim, but I think the experiments we're participating in outweigh a few minutes of inconvenience.

    Permalink
    2 likes
  • bcohen

    @rob

    " then I thought a bit more about it. What if they buyer wanted to tip someone with a Bitcoin keychain? Now they could just send the token to anyone's address on the forum, to send a neat gift. The recipient could claim it and get a physical keychain, or they could send it to someone else."

    Awesome, I like your thinking.

    Permalink
    0 likes
  • deweller

    I'll clear up the re-bidding question:

    The bids are cumulative.

    Say you bid 50,000 LTBc, then get outbid, and then send in an additional 50,000 LTBc. You will now have a single bid of 100,000 LTBc. This assumes that you sent both bids from the same address.

    Permalink
    1 like
  • deweller

    So, @bcohen, I hear your request for proxy bids.

    Here is what I am struggling with:

    I key component of proxy bidding is secrecy. Because all blockchain transactions are public, that secrecy is lost when bidding Counterparty tokens.

    Say you, Brian, throw down a 200,300 LTBc proxy bid. You overtake the high bidder and are sitting at the top for 100,000 LTBc.

    I, being the sneaky guy that I am, will then check Blockscan and see that you actually sent in 200,300. So, what I do is send in 199,000 LTBc with the certainty that I will be outbid. You will outbid me, pay me a bounty, and you'll then have a public bid for 200,000 (You paid me a 199 LTBc bounty for outbidding me).

    You would have been better off just jumping up to 200,000 in the first place because you would have paid a much smaller bounty to the previous bidder.

    My conclusion is that the bounty system (e.g. you get a reward for being outbid) actually penalizes people when their bid is held in proxy by an automated system.

    Permalink
    1 like
  • faceface

    Rob, I think I can answer your question... I accidentally just overbid by sending the full bid rather than 'topping up' my existing bid... oops.

    Can I unbid?

    Permalink
    0 likes
  • deweller

    You can top-up your bid by sending a second bid from the same address. The bids are cumulative.

    @faceface - I'm pretty sure someone will outbid you. 25k is very cheap for 2 HOURCONSULT tokens.

    Permalink
    1 like
Jump to top

Post Reply

Please Login to post a reply to this thread.

© Copyright 2013–2016 The LTB Network. All rights reserved .