Community Directory

Re: LTBcoin paper wallet

It is possible to export a private key from CounterWallet.

And to import the funds back into Counterwallet, you can "sweep" them into a new address.

So, the tools exist to export to a paper wallet, then sweep them back into Counterwallet.

Has anyone tried this yet?

Re: [Official] The 100,000 LTBcoin Logo Design Contest

Thanks!

There were some submissions posted before the forum transition that are missing from this thread. We are working to recover those now.

Re: Podcast Download Issues

I am also experiencing issues with the Podcasts app repeatedly downloading the same episode and it loses my place in episodes so I have to start over.

I think what is happening is that SoundCloud is generating temporary links for the files hosted on their CDN. These links expire and are regenerated regularly.

iTunes and the PodCast app might be seeing the new links and treat the downloads as completely different files.

You might try setting the element for each episode in the feed. I don't know if this will help prevent this, but it is worth a shot.

Re: Which ear should I listen with?

The left brain is the center of more logical, analytical, and objective thinking.  While the right brain controls more intuitive, thoughtful, and subjective processing.

Your right ear is connected with the left side of your brain and vice versa.

Re: How should the LTB Network Operate? Please Check out BetterMeans - Open Enterprise Governance Model

Here is an active fork of BetterMeans: https://github.com/mockdeep/better
Here is a live site: http://better.boon.gl/front/index.html (Uses self-signed SSL certificate)

Re: LTBCoin and the start of Private Network Tokens

It is not shutting down the launch.
Here is what the 40 byte limitations means for us:
With the 40 byte limitation in place, A Counterparty transaction must use the multi-sig functionality in order to put the necessary information into the block chain.  Because of that, you need to send more small amounts of BTC which means higher fees. 
A Counterparty transaction will require about 15 cents in fees now instead of 10 cents.

Re: Technical Question: Should the website hold LTBcoin balances for users?

After considering the security implications and the complexity involved here, I think this is too much to do for launch.
Let's go with our original and safest plan and use the Counterparty blockchain to start.  After we see what the pain points are, we can then fix them with a new service.
This is the MVP approach.  Launch - gather feedback - iterate.  I think this will best serve everyone.

Re: Technical Question: Should the website hold LTBcoin balances for users?

And to take it one step further - we don't even need to use bitcredits.io to fund someone's account.  We could create our own incoming gateway and fund credits to a user's account when we receive LTBCOIN sent to a specific address.
If this were the case, then we would be using bitcredits for a database and web wallet, but no LTBCOIN would ever pass through their system.

Re: Technical Question: Should the website hold LTBcoin balances for users?

In looking through their API, I see that bitcredits allows the filling of accounts with arbitrary amounts of credits.   Here is another possibility for distribution: Distribution Plan B Instead of issuing LTBCOIN directly on Counterparty every week, we issue LTBCOINCREDITS to a user's bitcredits.io wallet.

If a user wants to withdrawal LTBCOIN, they can spend their LTBCOINCREDITS in order to transfer of LTBCOIN to a Counterparty address.
Example: Say I am credited with 1000 LTBCOINCREDITS in the weekly distribution.
I can then "purchase" a transfer out to Counterparty.  I spend 1000 LTBCOINCREDITS and I receive 995 LTBCOIN sent to my Counterparty wallet address. The other 5 LTBCOIN is paid to the platform to recover the transaction fees.

Re: IPO schedule

No specific date yet, but we are moving ahead.  We hope to announce a date soon!