The LTB Network Forum

LTBcoin stats page

Back to LTBcoin Talk

Comments

• bcohen

  

  Offline
  Posts: 260

  @Cryptonaut oh yeah Re: http://letstalkbitcoin.com/ltbcoin-stats -- so far so good! Transparency is always good.

  BC

  Posted on July 27, 2014 at 8:59 AM
  Permalink
  1 like
• adam

  

  Offline
  Posts: 1980
  Location: California, USA

  @bcohen @adam

  "and then podcasts recieve a 4x multiplier on the pageviews since the majority of users consume podcasts without ever visiting its particular content page."

  That's sensible.

  However, Podcasters do receive substantially more POQ than writers though.

  I think (?) its now safe to assume that writers are driving traffic to Podcasts whereas prior to the launch of LTBcoin I assume (?) it used to be primarily the opposite... that Podcasts would drive traffic to the blog...

  just sayin' ;)

  I'm very aware of the issue Brian and I'm open to suggestions on how we address this.

  Posted on July 27, 2014 at 9:54 AM
  Permalink
  1 like
• goldbit

  

  Offline
  Posts: 67
  Location: United States

  @adam

  @bcohen @adam

  "and then podcasts recieve a 4x multiplier on the pageviews since the majority of users consume podcasts without ever visiting its particular content page."

  That's sensible.

  However, Podcasters do receive substantially more POQ than writers though.

  I think (?) its now safe to assume that writers are driving traffic to Podcasts whereas prior to the launch of LTBcoin I assume (?) it used to be primarily the opposite... that Podcasts would drive traffic to the blog...

  just sayin' ;)

  I'm very aware of the issue Brian and I'm open to suggestions on how we address this.

  Here is an idea that might work or might further enhance some brainstorming. Modify the magic word a little by adding "magic Podword" and "magic Blogword". I know this really just adds a few more LTBC to the listeners or readers or both but it should drive traffic both ways.Or instead of the new addition of Podword or Blogword combine both into the "magic words" and have part of it said within the podcast and the other part found within the blog.

  I hope this helps a little as i couldn't think of anything right away other then this as i do not know what writers make in POQ and what podcasters make in POQ. I think this would drive traffic from podcasters to the writers blogs and vice versa if the magic word(s) was only worth 5 points if both words are correct else it could be worth 2 points for podcast word or 2 points for blog word.

  Posted on July 27, 2014 at 2:02 PM
  Permalink
  0 likes
• adam

  

  Offline
  Posts: 1980
  Location: California, USA

  @goldbit

  @adam

  @bcohen @adam

  "and then podcasts recieve a 4x multiplier on the pageviews since the majority of users consume podcasts without ever visiting its particular content page."

  That's sensible.

  However, Podcasters do receive substantially more POQ than writers though.

  I think (?) its now safe to assume that writers are driving traffic to Podcasts whereas prior to the launch of LTBcoin I assume (?) it used to be primarily the opposite... that Podcasts would drive traffic to the blog...

  just sayin' ;)

  I'm very aware of the issue Brian and I'm open to suggestions on how we address this.

  Here is an idea that might work or might further enhance some brainstorming. Modify the magic word a little by adding "magic Podword" and "magic Blogword". I know this really just adds a few more LTBC to the listeners or readers or both but it should drive traffic both ways.Or instead of the new addition of Podword or Blogword combine both into the "magic words" and have part of it said within the podcast and the other part found within the blog.

  I hope this helps a little as i couldn't think of anything right away other then this as i do not know what writers make in POQ and what podcasters make in POQ. I think this would drive traffic from podcasters to the writers blogs and vice versa if the magic word(s) was only worth 5 points if both words are correct else it could be worth 2 points for podcast word or 2 points for blog word.

  Its about a 3:1 full length podcast: column

  Posted on July 27, 2014 at 2:06 PM
  Permalink
  0 likes
• bcohen

  

  Offline
  Posts: 260

  @adam

  "I'm very aware of the issue Brian and I'm open to suggestions on how we address this."

  Speaking out of self interest I would like to see more weight put on Breaking news stories (which would then have to be defined and probably reviewed/approved by editor).

  And does size matter? Dunno. I could easily "get away" with shorter articles but try to leave no stone unturned.

  but maybe (?) this all resolves itself in the POV...

  if so then it would be somehow getting better Podcast stats..

  Subscriber vs. listener vs. listener who turned podcast off after 10 minutes...

  but of course that's not really fair because we can't prove that someone read an article I wrote other than the headline----Headline Surfing. Just reading Reddit comments on articles usually prove that the are a substantial number of folks who don't read the article beyond the headline.

  o.k. --- you got me-- leave it the way it is--LOL

  Posted on July 27, 2014 at 2:28 PM
  Permalink
  0 likes
• adam

  

  Offline
  Posts: 1980
  Location: California, USA

  Brian what I've been thinking about doing is just breaking off different types of content into their own pools and making podcasts compete against podcasts, articles against articles. Written would have a smaller pool, but there would be defined amounts going to each of "the arts"

  Posted on July 27, 2014 at 2:32 PM
  Permalink
  1 like
• cracker

  

  Offline
  Posts: 105
  Location: Ritz HQ

  Just wanted to say, this stat page is awesome, thanks for doing it!

  Posted on July 28, 2014 at 8:35 PM
  Permalink
  0 likes
• goldbit

  

  Offline
  Posts: 67
  Location: United States

  @loon3

  @goldbit The Ltbc toolbox tools do not work with any number containing a comma (,). it returns a nan error if taken from everyones profile page or from counter party.

  The rest of the stat page looks nice and i cant wait to see further updates.

  I just revised the calculator. It now accepts commas.

  On the LTBC toolbox "LTBc Forum User Balance" , it still does not show rank among all asset holders.

  Posted on July 29, 2014 at 3:00 AM
  Permalink
  0 likes
• loon3

  

  Offline
  Posts: 243
  Location: Rhode Island, USA

  @goldbit

  @loon3

  @goldbit The Ltbc toolbox tools do not work with any number containing a comma (,). it returns a nan error if taken from everyones profile page or from counter party.

  The rest of the stat page looks nice and i cant wait to see further updates.

  I just revised the calculator. It now accepts commas.

  On the LTBC toolbox "LTBc Forum User Balance" , it still does not show rank among all asset holders.

  Yeah, I took it out because it was causing the lookup to timeout. You can find the rank manually by searching your address in the list of LTBCOIN asset holders on blockscan.com

  Posted on July 29, 2014 at 4:49 AM
  Permalink
  0 likes
• asdolino

  

  Offline
  Posts: 690

  @cracker Just wanted to say, this stat page is awesome, thanks for doing it!

  Indeed, I'm sharing it with my "crypto friends", I really like it.

  Posted on July 29, 2014 at 11:42 AM
  Permalink
  0 likes

Post Reply