The LTB Network Forum


LTBCoin on Peershares?

Back to LTBcoin Talk

Jump to bottom

Comments

flyingtriangle

When I listened to http://letstalkbitcoin.com/blog/post/lets-talk-bitcoin-129-dogeparty-and-delegated-proof-of-stake I realized that some of the issues mentioned there, is solved in Peershares.

Though I know that Adam prefers the coin word instead of the shares word, because of legal implications, Peershares could be easily forked (and the dividend feature simply turned of, if that is a concern) and names be changed.

Peershares being whitelabel, lends itself perfectly to the task. Since it requires basically no energy to run and features the kind of protocol that is plug-n-play in most crypto exchanges, it makes a perfect fit. It would also integrate with all other Bitcoin friendly technologies out there.

Learn more about Peershares here: http://peershares.net/

0 likes
  • flyingtriangle

    No one?

    Permalink
    0 likes
  • CrimsonRoze

    I visited the link and read a bit, but I don't quite see how it's different from counter/dogeparty. Would you care to elaborate on how this works and where the differences comes in?

    Permalink
    0 likes
  • flyingtriangle

    @crimsonroze I visited the link and read a bit, but I don't quite see how it's different from counter/dogeparty. Would you care to elaborate on how this works and where the differences comes in?

    Sure, no problem.

    Counter-party is built on top of Bitcoin. From what I understand, dogeparty would also be built on top of Doge.

    Peershares is not built on top of anything. Each new Peershares has its own blockchain, its own network, its own client and so forth and so on. If LTBCoin was implemented using the Peershares technology, then LTBCoin would have its own blockchain.

    Peershares use Proof-of-Stake (as implemented by Peercoin), the technology is very energy efficient (it can run on a Raspberry Pi) and therefor LTBCoin would be able to sustain itself by own means without any costs. The LTBCoin would then be totally independent, not have to rely on anything else but its own network, but still be able to use the software updates the devs does when maintaining Peershares.

    To simplify, one could think of Peershares as a WhitelabelCoin. Basically you get a new coin for free, without the cost of hiring devs to make it, buying mining machines etc.

    http://www.nubits.com/ is using Peershares.

    Was this helpful to you?

    EDIT: Ahh coolt. En svensk. Jag såg inte det först. Hej hej :)

    Permalink
    0 likes
  • adam

    @flyingtriangle

    @crimsonroze I visited the link and read a bit, but I don't quite see how it's different from counter/dogeparty. Would you care to elaborate on how this works and where the differences comes in?

    Sure, no problem.

    Counter-party is built on top of Bitcoin. From what I understand, dogeparty would also be built on top of Doge.

    Peershares is not built on top of anything. Each new Peershares has its own blockchain, its own network, its own client and so forth and so on. If LTBCoin was implemented using the Peershares technology, then LTBCoin would have its own blockchain.

    Peershares use Proof-of-Stake (as implemented by Peercoin), the technology is very energy efficient (it can run on a Raspberry Pi) and therefor LTBCoin would be able to sustain itself by own means without any costs. The LTBCoin would then be totally independent, not have to rely on anything else but its own network, but still be able to use the software updates the devs does when maintaining Peershares.

    To simplify, one could think of Peershares as a WhitelabelCoin. Basically you get a new coin for free, without the cost of hiring devs to make it, buying mining machines etc.

    http://www.nubits.com/ is using Peershares.

    Was this helpful to you?

    EDIT: Ahh coolt. En svensk. Jag såg inte det först. Hej hej :)

    We like that we can have many types of tokens on the one blockchain either bitcoin or dogecoin, can you do anything like this with peershares tech? or is it one coin per blockchain

    Permalink
    0 likes
  • flyingtriangle

    @adam

    @flyingtriangle

    @crimsonroze I visited the link and read a bit, but I don't quite see how it's different from counter/dogeparty. Would you care to elaborate on how this works and where the differences comes in?

    Sure, no problem.

    Counter-party is built on top of Bitcoin. From what I understand, dogeparty would also be built on top of Doge.

    Peershares is not built on top of anything. Each new Peershares has its own blockchain, its own network, its own client and so forth and so on. If LTBCoin was implemented using the Peershares technology, then LTBCoin would have its own blockchain.

    Peershares use Proof-of-Stake (as implemented by Peercoin), the technology is very energy efficient (it can run on a Raspberry Pi) and therefor LTBCoin would be able to sustain itself by own means without any costs. The LTBCoin would then be totally independent, not have to rely on anything else but its own network, but still be able to use the software updates the devs does when maintaining Peershares.

    To simplify, one could think of Peershares as a WhitelabelCoin. Basically you get a new coin for free, without the cost of hiring devs to make it, buying mining machines etc.

    http://www.nubits.com/ is using Peershares.

    Was this helpful to you?

    EDIT: Ahh coolt. En svensk. Jag såg inte det först. Hej hej :)

    We like that we can have many types of tokens on the one blockchain either bitcoin or dogecoin, can you do anything like this with peershares tech? or is it one coin per blockchain

    Depending on the use-case/why this is a requirement, my answer to this question might change. May I ask you why you need many types of tokens on the blockchain?

    Permalink
    0 likes
Jump to top

Post Reply

Please Login to post a reply to this thread.

© Copyright 2013–2016 The LTB Network. All rights reserved .