The LTB Network Forum


Do Intentions Matter? - Saturday Morning Musing

Back to Dojo

Jump to bottom
Pages: 123

Comments

adam

More and more I see people getting into entrepreneurial crypto projects who "can hear the song but can't whistle the tune".

They REALLY want to succeed, the world sucks right now if you want to build something successful and Bitcoin land is one of the few bright shiny stars of opportunity.

The problem is they don't much care at what they succeed, or how they get there.

Some people build businesses because they're solving a problem they're passionate about. Some people build businesses because they want to make a lot of money and buy a ski resort. The balance isn't too terrible yet, but we're certainly biasing towards the sportsters over time.

You can recognize this type of person fairly quickly. They are passionate speakers and evangelists but when pressed on detail, they will generate answers that don't make sense. Not that they are nonsense, rather that they demonstrate a fundamental misunderstanding for either the philosophy (neutrality) or function (decentralization) in an effort to help you see why their idea merits your time, attention, and/or money.

My self appointed job is to help catalyze people in the first column, but I also help those in the second column. I've recently begun rethinking whether that makes sense - My theory to this point has been that more knowledge and truth and understanding would be only a good thing and it didnt matter if I was speaking with a 22 year old garage startup guy or a seventies investment banker, understanding would breed normalcy which leads to "legitimacy" in the minds of people to whom that matters.

But things are moving fast now. Money is pouring into the ecosystem and just as importantly an ecosystem of projects built on fundraising bitcoin has sprung up to varying degrees of success.

Last year my time was fairly plentiful but this year I'm literally auctioning my time to the highest bidder by the hour. Maybe that means its time to focus on people actively doing productive things rather than broadly "casting my gaze".

Is it better to be neutral like Bitcoin, or to focus and exclude those who I dont find to be immediately valuable?

0 likes
  • CrimsonRoze

    "Better" is highly subjective. I can say for sure though, that I will most likely enjoy the podcasts where you only talk with those you find to be valuable compared to a podcast where you talked to those you don't find to be valuable.

    I assume the reason for this is some innate bias in where you would treat the two options differently based on your own preferences.

    That said, you seem confident in that you can in a very short timeframe make a decision as to who and what is and isn't worthy of your time which makes me call bogus!

    Over time you will miss some of the golden stuff, and you will accidently stick with some of the junk - I don't believe for a second that you'd be a great oracle capable of that decision.

    And that said, I still think you should be more selective since it makes for a, in my opinion, better podcast and information value. Or something to that extent.

    Now, if I only had you, and no one and no thing else to keep me posted on all the wondreous stuff in the cryptoworld I'd ask you to be neutral. But since I have multiple sources of information I can afford you to specialize. Please specialize.

    Permalink
    0 likes
  • adam

    The question is actually bigger than the show, I'm talking about my time in general. I talk to dozens of people each day and I try wherever possible to share with them any insight I might have on their project or approach from my perspective. I'm right a lot of the time, and sometimes people succeed because I help them where otherwise they would not have. I'm a background guy wherever possible.

    Is it better to be neutral like Bitcoin, or to focus and exclude those who I dont find to be immediately valuable to my ideal of a fair and neutral cryptocurrency ecosystem?

    Permalink
    0 likes
  • CrimsonRoze

    Will you get burnt out and tired if you expend effort to maintain neutrality? if so, you're long-term commitment is likely to be valued higher than neutrality.

    From my perspective the question is so broad that it might be worth pondering on what value any answer to it may actually give.

    I do like neutrality but from a practical standpoint there could be issues. Getting demotivated from a too inconsistent network of ideas is one such issue that could, in theory, happen.

    Permalink
    0 likes
  • adam

    I'm not concerned about losing motivation.

    Permalink
    0 likes
  • CrimsonRoze

    But I am concerned about you losing motivation and it is very likely that I am not alone with that concern.

    (That said, I am not an overlord governing your life, I'm just giving out my opinions because I find it interesting to see what replies I get from doing so.)

    Permalink
    0 likes
  • adam

    My philosophy is that when the rewards are so outsized to the cost of participation, it is best to bet on all the horses.

    What are you concerned could cause me to lose motivation?

    Permalink
    1 like
  • Nilli

    I'd say you should spend your efforts where you get the most for it. As CrimsonRoze pointed out, your own motivation should be taken into account as something that may not last forever. If you focus your energy on projects you don't, won't or can't believe in, you run the risk of exhausting your resources getting nothing in return. On the other hand, if you focus your energy on projects that are such sure bets that they would succeed without you anyway, then you're still not getting much in return.

    Maybe instead of 100% neutrality you could spend your efforts as 75% valuable and 25% neutral. That way you spend most of your efforts on things you are most likely enjoying, which will keep your motivation high, while still challenging yourself and others with a few projects that might not seem valuable on first glance. Who knows what gems you might uncover? It's up to you to find a balance that works well for you.

    Permalink
    0 likes
  • Nilli

    Hm, I started writing my post before you mentioned you're not concerned about motivation...

    Permalink
    0 likes
  • CrimsonRoze

    I'm just talking out of personal experience. When I'm put in positions where I want to move forward and explore possible futures and are met with diversions that goes against what I'm trying to achieve I tend to get demotivated. If it's just a few detractors here and there that takes my attention and tries to change the direction I'm heading I usually consider that valid and useful input. When there is more than just some occasions and starts to become a regular must-do-with thing I end up being less productive.

    The most productive time I have ever had coding, for example, was when I had no job and only a few others who had similar mindsets to talk with. Everything rushed off in one direction and things just got done.

    Permalink
    0 likes
  • adam

    @nilli Hm, I started writing my post before you mentioned you're not concerned about motivation...

    I don't do moderation very well, never have. I'd estimate my attention will be fixated on Bitcoin/Crypto as it is now for at least another year or two regardless of what happens, but if I continue to find success the timeline will extend.

    Permalink
    0 likes
Jump to top
Pages: 123

Post Reply

Please Login to post a reply to this thread.

© Copyright 2013–2016 The LTB Network. All rights reserved .