the larger the number of coins, the larger the number of transactions ( not necessarily proportionally more). do we really need the heavier block chain that 510 M would make as opposed to 51 M coins? It might be OK to let of of a few 1 coin transactions instead!
The LTB Network Forum
How many LTBcoins should there be?
Jump to bottomComments
-
Posted on March 29, 2014 at 7:13 PM0 likes
-
Posted on March 30, 2014 at 5:01 AM
510M seems about right. I think billions of coin would be unnecessary since this coin serves a specific community. It's big enough to make spending trivial.
0 likes -
Posted on March 30, 2014 at 12:02 PM
510M is good . 51M might be too few . actually it depends on whether Adam plans to make it divisible as an asset.
0 likes -
Posted on April 6, 2014 at 9:10 PM
I think 51M is good for divisible and 510M is good for a non divisable asset.
0 likes -
Posted on April 30, 2014 at 10:53 PM
has the thought about removing the like a post function and increasing the issuance size to get things circulating crossed your mind? then posters could be rewarded by liking with a actual reward coin- and it would promote posting and or tipping right away
0 likes -
Posted on May 5, 2014 at 3:53 AM
I vote for whatever gives me less zeros to type in.
0 likes -
Posted on May 6, 2014 at 2:47 PM
Half-a-billion will be decent enough to distribute in the beginning and then throughout the next couple years.
Last Edited: May 6, 2014 at 3:32 PM0 likes -
Posted on May 15, 2014 at 11:56 AM
How did the number 51 come up in this conversation? Was that something planned by Adam?Makes me think of 51% which isn't the best.
0 likes -
Posted on May 18, 2014 at 5:36 PM
51 was stated as a very lucky number, and I was already thinking about 50 as the basis number so we moved to that.
Right now the number is 510 million and they are divisible.0 likes -
Posted on June 26, 2014 at 5:21 AM
yeah maybe keep the level of coins high so that people spent and donate it more.
0 likes
Post Reply
Please Login to post a reply to this thread.





