@mdw It's different. It might even offer anonymity that is truly reliable. If so, it'll be the only one.
I assumed you wanted to learn about them, just like @Alchemix assumed you were interested in investing in them. What is your interest anyway?
@mdw It's different. It might even offer anonymity that is truly reliable. If so, it'll be the only one.
I assumed you wanted to learn about them, just like @Alchemix assumed you were interested in investing in them. What is your interest anyway?
You are correct about my interest. I appreciate your dumbing it down for me. Not technologically savvy. But, the summary was understandable. Thanks.
Unfortunately the math for zerocoin is tough, and I don't understand it. Maybe @therealtwig can explain it better, he's good at that. I do understand what's wrong with other schemes though. For example Coinjoin variants, unlike zero-knowledge proofs, will always be susceptible to Sybil attacks. Even if you use a fancy network of trusted master nodes and make it really, really hard.
Ring signatures is the other scheme people seem to like. But it seems to me like the old game with 3 cups and the ball is under one of them. Maybe you can't prove I did something, but how anonymous can you be among a crowd of 3?





