The LTB Network Forum

[25k LTBc][EDITING REQUEST] Token Controlled Viewpoint - Genesis, Characteristics and Early Use Cases

Back to The Writing Room

Comments

adam

Offline
Posts: 1980
Location: California, USA

https://docs.google.com/document/d/17l3ElFp45vYqyLw2OlzAZ3j0baTry4bS5bOqgRmMKLY/edit?usp=sharing

Please suggest edits directly in the doc, if you want to discuss and build on the concept lets have that convo in this thread.

25kLTBc will be split based on what I arbitrarily feel the contributions are. I value divergent opinions but am not looking for a philosophical argument about whether it is right to allow the creation of exclusionary societies. We are build use cases for tokens and I think this is a fantastic one.

Posted on July 13, 2014 at 10:47 AM

1 like

• Jack

  

  Offline
  Posts: 13

  @adam https://docs.google.com/document/d/17l3ElFp45vYqyLw2OlzAZ3j0baTry4bS5bOqgRmMKLY/edit?usp=sharing

  Please suggest edits directly in the doc, if you want to discuss and build on the concept lets have that convo in this thread.

  25kLTBc will be split based on what I arbitrarily feel the contributions are. I value divergent opinions but am not looking for a philosophical argument about whether it is right to allow the creation of exclusionary societies. We are build use cases for tokens and I think this is a fantastic one.

  I think this is a great idea. Could this TCV allow levels of access? For example, a user needs X amount of an asset in order to access certain information? Similar to a pyramidal hierarchy. For level one you need this asset(s), for level two you need this asset(s) and so on. Multilevel Token Controlled Viewpoints. I feel this type of idea could lead to reality based role playing games.

  Posted on July 13, 2014 at 11:11 AM
  Last Edited: July 13, 2014 at 11:14 AM
  Permalink
  0 likes
• adam

  

  Offline
  Posts: 1980
  Location: California, USA

  @jack

  @adam https://docs.google.com/document/d/17l3ElFp45vYqyLw2OlzAZ3j0baTry4bS5bOqgRmMKLY/edit?usp=sharing

  Please suggest edits directly in the doc, if you want to discuss and build on the concept lets have that convo in this thread.

  25kLTBc will be split based on what I arbitrarily feel the contributions are. I value divergent opinions but am not looking for a philosophical argument about whether it is right to allow the creation of exclusionary societies. We are build use cases for tokens and I think this is a fantastic one.

  I think this is a great idea. Could this TCV allow levels of access? For example, a user needs X amount of an asset in order to access certain information? Similar to a pyramidal hierarchy. For level one you need this asset(s), for level two you need this asset(s) and so on. Multilevel Token Controlled Viewpoints. I feel this type of idea could lead to reality based role playing games.

  Yes, please read the doc I hope that is clear that this can be stacking, is it not?

  Posted on July 13, 2014 at 11:20 AM
  Permalink
  0 likes
• Mike

  

  Offline
  Posts: 203
  Location: Chicago, IL

  Just a note -- in the end of the article you start developing the idea that content scheduling could be a primary use case.

  I don't particularly like this idea. It is limiting in a way that does not contribute to the community. I think what you would find in this case is a lot of people that say "screw it, I don't want to read this that badly anyway" and leave. Either that, or people who sign up for an account to read one article and never come back, especially if it wasn't the greatest article (which happens, no matter how interesting we are). Why would they want to be a part of a community that made them do work in order to read a sub-par article? These are precious wasted minutes.

  Posted on July 13, 2014 at 12:27 PM
  Permalink
  0 likes
• adam

  

  Offline
  Posts: 1980
  Location: California, USA

  @mjroncone Just a note -- in the end of the article you start developing the idea that content scheduling could be a primary use case.

  I don't particularly like this idea. It is limiting in a way that does not contribute to the community. I think what you would find in this case is a lot of people that say "screw it, I don't want to read this that badly anyway" and leave. Either that, or people who sign up for an account to read one article and never come back, especially if it wasn't the greatest article (which happens, no matter how interesting we are). Why would they want to be a part of a community that made them do work in order to read a sub-par article? These are precious wasted minutes.

  Section was reworked based on our convo and your suggestions while still keeping the usecase.

  Posted on July 13, 2014 at 1:04 PM
  Permalink
  0 likes
• adam

  

  Offline
  Posts: 1980
  Location: California, USA

  Thank you! Piece is done and locked down until the feature is out of development and we roll it out. I didn't know what this was at the beginning, but by the end I knew it was a product announcement :)

  @mjroncone - Biggest contributor by far, 17kLTBc coming your way for the first editing and co-writing pass - Matt, 3k coming for the additions you made. Denise will be doing a final technical editing for 5k

  Posted on July 13, 2014 at 1:35 PM
  Permalink
  1 like
• Mike

  

  Offline
  Posts: 203
  Location: Chicago, IL

  @adam Thank you! Piece is done and locked down until the feature is out of development and we roll it out. I didn't know what this was at the beginning, but by the end I knew it was a product announcement :)

  @mjroncone - Biggest contributor by far, 17kLTBc coming your way for the first editing and co-writing pass - Matt, 3k coming for the additions you made. Denise will be doing a final technical editing for 5k

  Cheers mate! Thanks in advance.

  LTBCoin aside, the editing practice plus a sneak peak at what's in the pipeline was well worth it. Hope to work with you again soon.

  Posted on July 13, 2014 at 1:42 PM
  Permalink
  0 likes
• Mike

  

  Offline
  Posts: 203
  Location: Chicago, IL

  @adam If you weren't already aware, it looks like the system kicked out three 0 transactions earlier.

  http://blockscan.com/address.aspx?q=1LwyDN7Bhq7yJV26v6mjjjf9dPUejkDBNH

  I'm just assuming this was from you, since it happened shortly after we edited the piece and there are specifically three addresses that received 0's. Also, the address was credited with 25k then sent it back.

  I don't particularly mind, I was just trying to figure out where I had gotten a 0 transaction from today.

  Posted on July 13, 2014 at 8:35 PM
  Permalink
  0 likes

Post Reply