While most altcoins are getting slaughtered, LTC shines propelled higher by Litepay and a new fork. Bitcoin continues its gains as well but stopped short of a new rally. Bitcoin Higher but Stops Short of New Rally Bitcoin prices traded even higher si...
Community Directory
- 48,823 Profile views
- 59 Articles Published
- 604 Forum Posts
- Real Name: Rob
- Location: California
- Website: http://TheBitcoinGame.com
Bio:
I'm a graphic artist and small-scale inventor/entrepreneur who started spending a lot of my time exploring Bitcoin in early 2013.
I've been accepting Bitcoin for design and print work since May 2013 (my first Bitcoin job was business cards for the Let's Talk Bitcoin team to bring to Bitcoin 2013 in San Jose).
Print4Bitcoin.comI've been selling Bitcoin Keychains since July 2013.
Bkeychain.comI made Litecoin keychains a bit later in 2013, but they haven't been selling that well (anyone want a deal on 1000 Litecoin keychains?).
Lkeychain.comI've written bitcoin articles on Let's Talk Bitcoin and Spelunk.in
LetsTalkBitcoin.com/blog
Spelunk.inAnd in October of 2014 I became an LTB Network podcaster with The Bitcoin Game!
TheBitcoinGame.comI'm definitely not a Bitcoin expert, just an enthusiast who enjoys participating as much as I can.
- Bitcoin Tipping Address (This is not your LTBCOIN address): 1Et1zVdxWFRpA7cEzNj1Tavsq8qPTp45Yb
User Activity
Forum Posts
- Replies: 569
- Topics: 35
- Likes Received: 292
-
Re: Proof of Participation point metric adjustments
@cryptonaut Good point actually. I guess it depends on how you are making that paper wallet. I think if you generate it on a offline computer, you should be able to use the "sign message" option to verify your address before committing the private key to paper without having to connect online at all (just write down or save the message signature somewhere temporarily)
Okay, thanks for that info.
Posted on November 23, 2014 at 12:53 PM
LTBcoin Talk -
Re: Podcast mastering
@rchrd Thank you and sorry for the english is not too sofisticated on my site, but this is not my mother tongue. I just quick checked your podcasts and I think no big problems with them. If you have specific questions, send me a pm, I will do my best to answer them.
Wow, that was nice of you to do. And I'm glad to hear that a professional sound person such as yourself thinks it sounds decent.
Posted on November 23, 2014 at 12:46 PM
Offering LTBCOIN For... -
Re: Proof of Participation point metric adjustments
@cryptonaut
any bitcoin address can hold counterparty tokens, so you can transfer to a paper wallet or whatever if you really wanted to. As long as you have the private keys you can just load it up in counterwallet and make transactions.Glad you brought this up, as it's a question I've pondered in the past… Is there a way to transfer LTBc (or any Counterparty asset) to a paper wallet AND verify ownership of the private key for that address with the LTB system? I couldn't think of a way to securely do that. But, of course, my technical expertise is lacking.
Posted on November 23, 2014 at 11:43 AM
LTBcoin Talk -
Re: Podcast mastering
Looking at your site made me realize I really don't know what I'm doing. My audio work is based mostly on trial-and-error (both short-term and longterm). I should probably take time to learn more to figure out the best workflow, as I'm sure I'm doing a bunch of stuff wrong (or inefficiently).
Posted on November 23, 2014 at 9:04 AM
Offering LTBCOIN For... -
Re: Proof of Participation point metric adjustments
I think it's fascinating to watch this experiment as you try to figure out the best ways to combat the bots, etc. I guess you can just keep tweaking and seeing the results. Maybe you'll eventually develop a really amazing system! Though I guess it's always a chess game vs. people who will keep trying to game the system for LTBc.
I'm trying to figure out what the downside of weighting the likes based on LTBc might be (other than giving early forum members and content creators a lot of power). I guess for $17, one could buy 100K LTBc, then "like" a bunch of comments, then send the LTBc to another account, which could "like" a bunch of comments, and that could be repeated. Is it too crazy to set up an algorithm to watch the flow of LTBc, to keep this from happening? Or could something verify that the 100K LTBc has been in the account for some minimum amount of time? Both are probably too complex, but I'm just thinking of ways people might game the new system you propose.
BTW, in reference to it seeming the top LTBc earners are benefiting from like farms, do you take any action against those people/bots who seem to be totally gaming the system? Or is that too draconian, and perhaps you don't want to mistakenly penalize anyone who is (fairly) innocent? Or maybe you play by whatever rules you set up each week?
Posted on November 23, 2014 at 9:01 AM
LTBcoin Talk





















623 views