Community Directory

Forum Posts

• Replies: 72
• Topics: 4
• Likes Received: 28

• Re: AUDIENCE QUESTION REQUEST: DAMELION of NXT

  @adam can you please address the following issues?

  Billion NXT was distributed amongst ~70 investors. Amongst these ~70 individuals, the top 10 held 50% of all NXT. How is this any better than the crisis of current banks? Is it not a proper pyramid architecture?

  As of May 2014, the percentage of active NXT on the network (amount of NXT being forged at any given time) is roughly 30%. This means that until transparent forging is fully implemented, it would be possible to perform a 51% attack by having 150 Million NXT.

  Is not delegating your stake to someone whom you can't trust is exactly the current scenario of banks but without fractional reserve system?

  What is their plan of action against 0 day exploits in Java?

  Posted on July 25, 2014 at 6:03 AM
  Listener Lounge

• Re: Anyone else get 22+ billion HATE tokens?

  @matt This is hypocrisy and profanity in action, if you can please send him LOVECOIN so that it may help him to realize what Divinity is.

  Posted on July 25, 2014 at 5:42 AM
  LTBcoin Talk

• Re: I (like) my posts

  I reckon it is Narcissism in cyberspace.

  Posted on July 25, 2014 at 5:30 AM
  LTB Platform Development & Support

• Monopoly

  I was watching an interview of Tim Wu about Net Neutrality and Master Switch.

  I would like to know your thoughts and insights in regards to monopoly, its implications in the short and long term future.

  Will the cycle continue or the technology like Blockchain will disrupt the cycle once and forever in this planet?

  Posted on July 24, 2014 at 7:15 AM
  General

• Re: Ethereum cartoon

  What if the smart contract he signed has an unintentional bug that sent ethereum to Venus?

  What if he intentionally planted a bug as in independence day to populate the moon with virus?

  What if it is the origin of Skynet?

  There are lot of unanswered questions, only time can answer.

  Posted on July 24, 2014 at 5:25 AM
  The Content Market

• Re: LTBcoin 'reputation staking' linked with account

  @rotalumis is it ok if I include the details of implementation in LTBcoin.

  Posted on July 23, 2014 at 6:40 AM
  LTBcoin Talk

• Re: LTBcoin 'reputation staking' linked with account

  @ltb4me It is interesting you mentioned about it I am currently working on an article based on Proof of Reputation. But it is not about implementing in LTBcoin.

  Posted on July 23, 2014 at 6:32 AM
  LTBcoin Talk

• Re: Dogeparty! Counterparty on the Doge Blockchain! Proof of Burn? Or Proof of Charity?

  The objective of Proof of Burn is to lock the value of n number of coins by keeping out of circulation forever.

  But I like the idea of Proof of Charity if the same objectives are met. One suggestion is if n number of Dogecoin to be burned are removed from circulation by converting to n number of XDP.charities token and pegged at the current market value of Dogecoin. Then the tokens are donated to the charities.

  This will enable locking the value of n number of Dogecoins out of circulation and at the same time transfer the value of the coins to the charities as XDP tokens.

  Posted on July 22, 2014 at 1:12 PM
  Listener Lounge

• Re: Record my article(s) as audio.

  @adam @CrimsonRoze I would also like to give it a go. Either we can do as an single edition with 2 articles or two different editions.

  My article: Blockchain Bootstrapping Resource Based Economy

  Posted on July 21, 2014 at 11:21 AM
  Offering LTBCOIN For...

• Re: https

  @cryptonaut If you are planning to implement HTTPS in future have a look at CAcert.

  They are community based who provide root certificate and server certificates.

  Posted on July 21, 2014 at 7:53 AM
  LTB Platform Development & Support