While most altcoins are getting slaughtered, LTC shines propelled higher by Litepay and a new fork. Bitcoin continues its gains as well but stopped short of a new rally. Bitcoin Higher but Stops Short of New Rally Bitcoin prices traded even higher si...
Community Directory
- 15,696 Profile views
- 2 Articles Published
- 347 Forum Posts
- Email: [email protected]
- Real Name: Devon Weller
- LTBcoin Compatible Address: 1JztLWos5K7LsqW5E78EASgiVBaCe6f7cD
- Location: Nashville, TN
- Website: http://devonweller.com
Bio:
Cryptocurrency web application developer, entrepreneur and board gamer.
- Bitcoin Tipping Address (This is not your LTBCOIN address): 1JztLWos5K7LsqW5E78EASgiVBaCe6f7cD
- Public Bitcoin Addresses:
User Activity
Forum Posts
- Replies: 310
- Topics: 37
- Likes Received: 142
-
Re: Technical Question: Should the website hold LTBcoin balances for users?
I like the idea of a minimum and maximum payout thresholds. In other words, once my account reaches the maximum (say 10,000 LTBc) threshold, then the coin is flushed out to Counterparty automatically with no fees.
The transaction fee could be adjustable in the platform admin. That way the platform can make sure to recoup its costs depending on the current market value of LTBc.Posted on May 13, 2014 at 6:43 PM
Project Development -
Re: Technical Question: Should the website hold LTBcoin balances for users?
Here's a crazy idea...
What if all distributions were subject to a fixed fee? And users could decide whether to have funds automatically distributed (and pay the 10 LTBc fee) or held in their account for a later time and distributed manually.
This way the platform is not responsible for covering all the Counterparty fees.
What do you think?Posted on May 13, 2014 at 6:10 PM
Project Development -
Re: Technical Question: Should the website hold LTBcoin balances for users?
Say I have 99 LTBcoin in my account (which is not enough to meet the threshold), but I want to be paid NOW!
Perhaps we add a payout now option, but a 10 LTBc fee is charged. That way, LTB recovers the fee in LTBc and the recipient doesn't have to send any BTC to the platform just to get paid.
The user could verify that they own the recipient account by signing a message like "Please send me my 99 LTBcoin". Counterwallet has the signing function built in.Posted on May 13, 2014 at 6:03 PM
Project Development -
Re: Technical Question: Should the website hold LTBcoin balances for users?
Here is a possible answer to #1 (Funny how asking a question sometimes leads you to a possible answer):
Perhaps automatic payouts are subject to a minimum. So, if the weekly payout amount is less than 100 LTBcoin to a given address, then that payout is suspended and noted in an internal accounting system.
All suspended payouts are lumped together and sent to an escrow address and the internal accounting system is updated.
If at the end of any week, the sum for any suspended payout address becomes greater than 100, then it is included.Posted on May 13, 2014 at 3:30 PM
Project Development -
Technical Question: Should the website hold LTBcoin balances for users?
The ideal situation is that LTBcoin is only ever held in CounterParty. No one wants to get Goxed.
But, as I started thinking through the implications of this, I realized that there are some real technical challenges to overcome.
Here are a couple that I thought of:
1) How do we handle the fees for weekly distributions?
Imagine distributing LTBcoin to 1,000 users every week? How about 10,000? How about 50,000? There are fees for each Counterparty transaction. After implementing proof of tip and proof of comment, we could be paying fees on sending hundreds or thousands of small LTBcoin transactions every week.
This is fundamentally a problem about micropayments.
Imagine a user who made one comment during the week. Is it feasible to pay 5-10 cents in fees to send a couple LTBcoin to that user at the end of the week?
2) What about a user who comments but doesn't have a Counterparty address associated with their account yet?
Do they just lose their payment for the week? Where does it go?Posted on May 13, 2014 at 3:08 PM
Project Development -
Re: LTBcoin paper wallet
An LTBcoin private key is a bitcoin private key.
So, yes, if you have a tool to print a two-factor paper wallet for a bitcoin address, then this will work for LTBcoin as well.Posted on May 13, 2014 at 2:58 PM
Project Development -
Re: white paper of LTBcoin
Here is my working draft of a white paper.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iIoF7DlguKbdA1A-a3fSTi6xiFgks9QLiTd8hn6lwE8/edit?usp=sharing
I would benefit from your comments. I still need a conclusion.
What else is missing?
My intention was to keep this paper related to just the coin itself. There is a lot more information we need to publish about how content is published and paid. But I propose that this information be published in separate documents.Posted on May 12, 2014 at 12:12 PM
LTBcoin Talk -
Re: white paper of LTBcoin
Thanks. I took that document, pulled out the specifics about LTBcoin and I am using it to formulate a white paper.
I will post it for comments soon.Posted on May 10, 2014 at 12:04 PM
LTBcoin Talk -
Re: Counterwallet
Yes! https://www.counterwallet.co/
Posted on May 10, 2014 at 12:01 PM
LTBcoin Talk -
Re: LTBCoin=GloballShare+Coin2+Faircoin
We're working on the whitepaper for LTBcoin now. Please visit this forum post for updates and to help out:
http://forum.ltbcoin.com/discussion/174/white-paper-of-ltbcoinPosted on May 8, 2014 at 2:01 PM
LTBcoin Talk












2,944 views