Being as a lot of the regulation has to do with AML and KYC...would the following scenario fall within the regulatory language, or not...
Merchant outside of NY sells services to a customer in NY for BTC only. Merchant deals strictly in BTC and alts...BUT.......the purchaser in NY acquired their BTC via fiat on an exchance, local trader, etc...
Since that BTC has fiat connected to it, is the merchant responsible to know that and does it then fall under the language of bitlicenses? And is there a way to see what BTC, mBTC have fiat 'blood on their hands'?





